Representative engagements

Engagement Examples for Critical Infrastructure Risk and Resilience

Systems Risk Advisory supports assessments, planning, exercises, training, and executive briefings for organizations responsible for essential services. These examples show how engagements can be structured without disclosing client names, facility details, system designs, or sensitive security information.

Representative engagements, not public case studies

Critical infrastructure leaders often know they need help, but they may not know what an assessment, planning project, exercise, or workshop should include. This page provides representative engagement examples that show the types of support Systems Risk Advisory can provide.

The examples below are intentionally sanitized. They describe common engagement structures and outcomes without identifying clients, facilities, vendors, network details, security weaknesses, or incident-sensitive information.

Each engagement is scoped around the organization, operating environment, leadership questions, risk tolerance, and available staff time. Some projects are narrow and focused. Others combine cyber, physical, OT/ICS, emergency planning, training, and tabletop exercise components into a broader readiness effort.

Confidentiality note

SRA does not publish client names, facility details, network diagrams, findings, incident details, or sensitive security information without authorization.

These examples are not fixed packages. Final scope, schedule, level of detail, site work, interviews, deliverables, and pricing depend on the organization and engagement goals.

The page should not imply that all examples have been performed for a named client unless a specific case study has been approved for public release.

Engagement examples

These examples show common ways Systems Risk Advisory can help organizations move from concern to a defined scope, practical findings, and next steps.

Common engagement models

Engagements can be narrow, standard, or expanded depending on the question, schedule, risk level, staff availability, and required deliverables.

Focused engagement

A narrow project aimed at one issue, such as remote access, ransomware readiness, physical security, tabletop exercise facilitation, or an executive briefing.

Standard assessment or planning project

A structured engagement that includes interviews, document review, selected technical or facility review, findings, recommendations, and leadership briefing material.

Expanded readiness effort

A larger effort that combines assessment, planning, workshops, exercise design, facilitation, after-action reporting, and improvement tracking.

Best-fit organizations

  • Water and wastewater utilities preparing AWIA RRA and ERP updates
  • Public works departments responsible for multiple essential services
  • Municipal electric utilities, public power agencies, and electric cooperatives
  • Local government organizations that need cyber, physical, and emergency planning support
  • Critical infrastructure organizations with OT/ICS, SCADA, field assets, facilities, and vendor dependencies
  • Boards, councils, commissioners, executives, and managers who need decision-ready risk information

Common deliverables

Deliverables are selected during scoping. The goal is to provide clear material that can be used by leadership, staff, boards, councils, commissioners, emergency managers, and technical teams.

Executive summary

A concise leadership-facing summary of key risks, priorities, decisions, and recommended next steps.

Findings and recommendations

A practical report organized by risk area, consequence, priority, and suggested improvement path.

Improvement roadmap

A sequenced list of near-term, mid-term, and longer-term actions based on feasibility and operational importance.

Plan updates

Suggested updates to incident response plans, emergency response plans, continuity plans, communications plans, or exercise materials.

Briefing material

Slides or talking points for boards, councils, executives, managers, and department leaders.

Exercise package

Scenario, injects, facilitator notes, participant questions, after-action findings, and improvement recommendations when tabletop support is included.

How Systems Risk Advisory works

The approach is practical, mission-focused, and designed for organizations that must keep essential services operating under real constraints.

Start with mission and consequence

Engagements focus first on what services must continue, what could affect safety or public trust, and which decisions matter most.

Use plain language

Findings are written for leaders, operators, IT, OT, emergency managers, and public works staff who need to act on the results.

Connect cyber and physical risk

SRA reviews how facilities, field assets, networks, remote access, vendors, communications, and emergency procedures affect each other.

Prioritize what can be improved

Recommendations are organized so the client can distinguish urgent fixes from larger planning or budget items.

Support leadership decisions

Reports and briefings help managers, boards, councils, commissioners, and executives understand risk and choose next steps.

Protect sensitive information

Engagement materials avoid unnecessary exposure of security-sensitive details and can be structured for limited distribution when needed.

Discuss the right engagement for your organization

Use these examples as a starting point. Systems Risk Advisory can help define a focused assessment, planning project, workshop, exercise, executive briefing, or broader readiness effort based on your operating environment and risk concerns.